head

Stars explained: * A production of no real merit with failings in all areas. ** A production showing evidence of not enough time or effort, or even talent, and which never breathes any real life into the piece – or a show lumbered with a terrible script. *** A good enjoyable show which might have some small flaws but has largely achieved what it set out to do.**** An excellent show which shows a great deal of work and stage craft with no noticeable or major flaws.***** A four star show which has found that extra bit of magic which lifts theatre to another plane.
Half stars fall between the ratings

hound trio

  Lucy Talbot as Dr Watson, Gareth May as Sherlock Holmes and Joshua Gallagher as Sir Henry Baskerville

The Hound of the Baskervilles

Grange Playhouse

*****

Terror comes in many forms, and this dramatisation of Sherlock Holmes’s celebrated and most shocking of cases brings its own chilling fear to any who witness it . . . mainly a fear of chuckling to death, or even worse, leaking with laughter . . . . Who knew Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle, to give him his Sunday name, had such a bent for comedy!

With freezing temperatures, gas bills rivalling mortgages, and a war-torn world in floods and flames, we really do need a moment of escape, a chance to laugh to forget the gloom for while, and this does the job beautifully, pure comedy gold.

The tale is simple with a hell hound roaming the wilds of Dartmoor frightening the congenitally feeble hearted Baskerville clan into a fatal state of cardiac arrest one by one . . . it’s actually the same Baskerville bloke each time but we’ll let that pass, so Holmes and Watson hotfoot it down to Dartmoo (sic) to solve the . . .whatever.

In truth there is more of The Goons than gloom about this production and if you knew nothing of the story when you arrived, your knowledge will remain pretty much unsullied by anything that happens by the time you leave, but by golly you will have had a laugh – about one a minute at a rough estimate.

The 15 or so characters are played by a cast of three with Gareth May in the lead (lead in the loosest sense of the word here) role of Sherlock Holmes, his detective showing a level of pomposity worthy of an Arts Council grant.

May also pops up as the Baskerville’s ancient retainer Barrymore and his wife Mrs Barrymore, who seems to be Mr Barrymore with an upturned beard . . . He is also the mysterious, crippled, becrutched and eye-patched foreign accented naturalist Mr Stapleton as well as his sister - or maybe wife - the Spanish femme(ish) fatale Cecile who could easily be mistaken for a zero hours occasional flamenco dancer from a Benidorm working men’s cch . . . lub. He or she, depending upon whether a fan is involved, is also a railway guard, an old woman on a train and some mad besmocked yokel.

hound window

Gareth May as Mrs Barrymore, Dr Watson and Sir Henry with a window on the world of the Moo

It is his first, or perhaps in his case, these, are his first appearances at Grange although he is no stranger to treading the boards, we having reviewed him regularly in the past at Dudley Little Theatre. He provides the love interest . . . times was hard in 19th century Devon . . . with a tango that wouldn’t look out of place on Strictly (Ann Widdecombe era) with Sir Henry, of which more later.

Another debutante is Lucy Talbot who gives us an enthusiastic, if intellectually limited Dr Watson, and as she is on stage Watsoning much of the time, she only has time to fit in a local yokel on Dartmoo (sic) on top of her day job.

A well known singer/songwriter she is no stranger to performing around the West Midlands and you would never guess this was her theatrical debut - ducks and water springs to mind - along with May she adds to the burgeoning talent available at the Playhouse.

Joshua Gallagher is another seasoned performer who first appeared at the Grange in Accomplice back in 2023. He first arrives on stage as Dr James Mortimer, Sir Charles Baskerville’s great, and if we are honest, somewhat eccentric, verging on mad, friend. He is also Sir Charles but as he is dead we won’t count that.

Now Sir Charles looks, or now he is dead again, looked remarkably like his nephew Sir Henry Baskerville, also played by Gallagher, last of the Baskerville line and heir of the Baskerville estate and fortune and in grave danger of being the end of the line. He falls for Cecile in a doomed love affair which shows love is blind . . . and so, it seems, is Sir Henry.

His Sir Henry is Canadian and remarkably camp, not that Sir Henry was camp mind, after all this is 1889, but Gallagher explained he couldn’t do a Canadian accent, so he had to do something different. C’est la vie as they say in Quebec.

Gallagher also had a mortal fear of the sound of a giant hound capable of ripping flesh from the bones of anyone found alone on the mist enshrouded moor, or, in this case, the stage of the Playhouse, so the standard sound effects of (dramatic music) the howling of The Hound of the Baskervilles, turned him into a gibbering wreck which brought Act I to a gibbering halt.

He also swans up as a London cabbie, Guv, fag in the corner of his mouth, a banjo playing Dartmoo (sic) yokel with a hint of Dueling Banjos, another yokel selling a dead lamb in a bag – don’t ask – and a dead bloke at the beginning who was not part of the play so we’ll leave him out to avoid confusion. 

homes and watson

The classic detective team . . . Holmes and Watson

Just about every comedy trick in the book was utilised by the wonderful cast and their director Rod Bissett and they avoided any dragging moments, that killer of comedy, by keeping up a cracking pace. Not everything worked, classic comedy isn’t like that, but the laughs come so thick and fast any misfires are drowned out by the next guffaw.

The trio showed superb timing, the one aspect of comedy that cannot be taught, it’s instinctive, you either have it or you don’t, and you have to admire the rehearsal hours that must have gone in for the scores of costume changes, entrances and exits to make it flow so well.

We even had the first act twice. Some bloke in the audience, another Roger Clarke apparently – everyone’s a critic these days – had tweeted some disparaging remarks during the interval about May’s performance. How this bloke managed to get a wifi signal at the Playhouse is a mystery in itself, but we’ll let that pass.

Anyhow it meant we had to sit through the entire first act again – thankfully it only took about three minutes, and, let’s be honest, it was helpful for older members of the audience where a break of 15 minutes means the first act might as well never have happened. Has it started yet, Nurse?

The set design by Bissett is . . . well a painting of the moor filling the stage back. That’s it. While the props from Bissett and Mark Natrass are minimal but so effective at garnering laughs. We have the RoRo door, Rocky Horror style upright bed, a fireplace on castors, a chair, a couple of benches for a train, taxi or steam room, a Dartmoo (sic) sign and a dead body who can be anybody you want dead – only characters in the play before you get any ideas.

Then there is the picture frame which displays the entire Baskerville line, sort of, who all look a bit like Gallagher, sort of. The play was adapted by John Nicholson and Steven Canny back in 2007, both having writing credits for radio and there is that feel about the play which mixes visual madcap comedy with clever dialogue, the hallmark of radio comedy.

If you enjoyed the four man version of The 39 Steps then you will love this, the energy levels are kept up to a Spinal Tap 11 level to the end and for any Sherlock Holmes fans, this is an affectionate take on the classic tale, at times hilarious, gloriously daft, clever, inventive and thoroughly enjoyable, and all done without an "Elementary my dear Watson" anywhere in sight! Sadly we don't have the space to tell you who dunnit but it is roaming the Moo to 18-01-25.

Roger Clarke

(a different one than the one that tweeted)

09-01-25

Home Reviews A-Z Reviews by affiliate